An Obsession the World Doesn’t Share Essay

In his essay, An Obsession the World Doesnt Share, Roger Cohen describes in detail the way other(a) countries view the actions of the United States Government and President provide (New York Times, 2004). Mr. Cohens primary(prenominal) judgment throughout the obligate is how the United States political sympathies is reacting, or non reacting, to human race issues due to the focus on 9/11/01. The generator uses countries such as atomic number 16 Africa, and brazil-nut tree to make his touch that these countries are facing unadulterated problems and the USA, which has always been seen as a helping inelegant is now focused on terrorism.Supporting viewpoints of his main idea are the circumstance that in Canada, a recent statue of President Bush was erected in the equal form as Iraqs past leader, Sadaam Hussein. In addition, the author notes the AIDS epidemic in South Africa and the economic factors in Latin America. Mr. Cohen continues his main idea by making the suggestio n that any impregnable the USA government has done (i. e. giving bullion to support AIDS education), is overshadowed by the fight on terrorism.Mr. Cohens point in this article is to allege Americans about how the rest of the world views their country. His central seam seems to be that despite the good our government has done, it is entirely overshadowed by our dire need to revenge for 9/11 terrorist attacks. The author uses facts to back up his tune from what seems to be reliable sources, such as the government of these nations, and Ambassadors for these countries.The tone of this article is informative, the author presents his descents without bias and his private judgments are few. The author uses a logos appeal, presenting his argument as a logical, reasonable one. Although it does not pop that there are many weaknesses in his argument, both(prenominal) information is excluded, namely that of President Bushs view, because Bushs view was not distinctly stated, this alo ne may make the author about biased towards the other countries, who are in take asking for our help.This writer accepts Mr. Cohens argument. I imagine that all the good the USA may be doing for other countries, IS overshadowed by what seems to be revenge for not only 9/11 but for the gulf War as well. The fact that our government is absorbed on punishing Middle Eastern countries, which had weeny or no involvement in 9/11, speaks volumes about what is important (fighting and not assisting). In this article, the author states, The problem is the perception that Bush uses immense author in an egotistical way. (NY Times, 2004)This writer strongly believes this to be the truth as evidenced by the fact that Hussein of Iraq was a main focal point of the terrorism instead of the one who committed the crimes (Bin Laden). As assumed from this article, President Bush is not well-liked by other countries and even Americans are growing degenerate of Bushs so-called priorities. In sum, M r. Cohen has presented an capably named title of how the world negatively views our government. Unfortunately, most Americans do not differ on this viewpoint.